Skip to main content

It would be funnier...

...if it weren't so devastating...

http://hannahhurtful.tumblr.com/post/100359317047/kat-blaque-josephrosalie-hermionejg

Come on, guys... Really?!? These same, tired old arguments.

Being a feminist doesn't diminish my masculinity. It enhances it.

Comments

lillysmum said…
Yeah, Feminists are ugly. Feminists just need a man. Just need to get laid. There's a lot of them.
Bill Cobabe said…
I like being a man. Powerful women do not threaten me. Powerful people do powerful things. Gender is irrelevant. I want everyone to feel as able and capable and empowered as they wish.

I don't get it. I doubt I ever will.
lillysmum said…
I don't either. Nor will I. I like being a woman. But, yeah...
Bill Cobabe said…
Indeed.

FWIW, I, too, am glad you're a woman. I just wish it were easier.
Anonymous said…
Ten years ago, we were a country that was generally getting along. Were there a few problems with race and poverty? Yes. There will always be problems with race; there will always be problems with poverty. Man is a flawed beast. However, ten years ago we were making some real progress in both of those areas. But a happy, well-adjusted country wasn't going to get liberals what they wanted, which is control of the country. So they had to make the 2008 election about race...if you didn't vote for the black man, you were racist. Even though he won not one, but two terms, that wasn't enough. Those that are against Obama's socialist policies are just the white man trying to keep the black man down. Obama singlehandedly has pushed race relations back at least 50 yeras in this country. The liberals' only mindset is not dealing with the issues and making this a better country, but picking at scabs and starting new wounds. All this contention and division for what? For power; to win elections.

So why now are we suddenly hearing about the war on women? There is no war on women, just as there is no racism overall in America. The reason the liberals have fabricated this problem and spun this lie is because it's almost time to make history again: it's time to have the first woman president. And if you're not voting for her, you just hate women! Make sure you don't bring up the real issues in this upcoming election--then you'd have to talk about Hillary's track record, which is a dismal failure; she's been in bed with a socialist for the past 8 years, and the sane people of this country, the majority, hate what Obama has done to this country. Even the people in the Democratic Party are distancing themselves from Obama.

Hillary did such a stellar job as Secretary of State...maybe she could run on the great relationship we have with Russia that she “reset;” or what great progress we've had the last 8 years in the Middle East; or she could talk about how she saved Ambassador Chris Stevens in Benghazi...oh wait, maybe not.

If you bring up the real issues, you'd have to talk about a REAL war on women--a woman who won't stand up for herself; a woman who is repeatedly insulted and degraded while her husband is out philandering; if you want to talk about something humiliating for women, talk about the way Hillary allows herself to be treated and used and abused.

So since you can't talk about the real issues, how are you going to sell Hillary to the American people? You've got to make it about a war on women. If you say it over and over, it becomes an unchallenged fact that becomes part of our consciousness. Liberals are very good at preying on people;s emotions. They are trying to make you upset and vote for Hillary--give her a pity vote,vote for her gender, because CLEARLY she isn't the best person for the job. We've read this script before; we've played this game before. Unfortunately, you fall right into their hands. You are ruled by emotion rather than logic--the perfect liberal!

One of the scriptures you love to quote that you think fits your liberal agenda is in 4 Nephi:

2 And it came to pass in the thirty and sixth year, the people were all converted unto the Lord, upon all the face of the land, both Nephites and Lamanites, and there were no contentions and disputations among them, and every man did deal justly one with another.

3 And they had all things common among them; therefore there were not rich and poor, bond and free, but they were all made free, and partakers of the heavenly gift.

But read on and discover that pride and iniquity and contention gradually worked their way in:

35 And now it came to pass in this year, yea, in the two hundred and thirty and first year, there was a great division among the people.

That's what modern-day liberals love to do...cause DIVISION among the people. Aren't you better than this?
Bill Cobabe said…
Anymouse-

I would love to entertain your philosophy, mingled with scripture, if I hadn't already been warned. So, thanks for your attempt at vitriolic persuasion - or at least exposition - but I don't think you have any real evidence of your point of view other than the frenzied Fox News sales pitches. My advice is to turn off the conspiracy theorist rhetoric, and just look around. Feminism has been going strong in its modern configuration for over 100 years. And while great strides have been made, the discussion must go on until the discrimination has ended. This is true of race as well. Because, anymouse, the divisions ARE ALREADY THERE, and thoughtful and charitable people work to diminish those arbitrary and hurtful divisions.

And if we do quote those scriptures it is to point out that there is hope, that it can be done. Which is probably the point of the inclusion of the verses in the first place. It is also instructive to note that it was economic division that first separated the people, based in pride and the abandonment of charity.

Popular posts from this blog

2020 - A retrospective

 There will no doubt be many retrospectives written about the year that was 2020. It was a tough year for most, a good year for many, and generally speaking a very interesting year. Which reminds me of the the old curse - may you live in interesting times. Because, you see - interesting does not always mean good. It does not mean better. It does not mean happy. It just means interesting. So to highlight just how interesting things were, I offer the following post about things that went on. Or didn’t went on. It’s not intended to be chronological, necessarily, or even accurate. It’s just some of my observations.... Let’s start with the pandemic. Pandemic is a word that was previously the realm of science fiction and/or horror writers (The Stand comes to mind). Late 2019 a disease was identified in Wuhan, China, which is a place I’d never heard of before. Apparently coming from some kind of exotic meat market, this strain of Coronavirus was something that the world hadn’t seen before. Ma

Is this thing still on?

 Does anyone even blog anymore? I remember when it first got started and everyone was having a blog. I like writing, and I do a lot of it in my professional life, but not everything makes it onto this blog, which is where a lot of my personal thoughts come out. I put more into Facebook lately, too, because it's a little easier. But there's something to be said for this long-form writing exercise, and I think I will continue here periodically. You don't mind, do you? Well, in my last post I wrote about how difficult things were for me at the time. That changed in July when I finally got a job working for the State of Utah. I was the program manager for the moderate income housing database program, and that meant I worked from home a lot but also went in to Salt Lake when needed, mostly on the train. It was a good experience, for the most part, and I'm grateful for the things I learned even in the short time I was there.  In October I started working for Weber County in t

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h