Skip to main content

Milkdromeda?

This weekend I spent some time in southern Utah. It was a total blast - we went to Calf Creek, which is one of my absolute favorite places on earth. But this post isn't about that. Rather, this post is about the night's sky. See, for the first time in my life, I saw the Andromeda Galaxy. It looks like this:


What I saw through my binoculars looked a little more like this:

Image result for andromeda galaxy

Just a faint smudge with a brighter central region.

So here's what's been blowing my mind. Andromeda is 2.5 million light years away. That's so far away that it's almost incomprehensible, although it is close enough to see with the naked eye (after I knew what I was looking for I was able to see it, but it was very, very faint). First off, think of how much light must be emitted in order to even see anything at all! But then, thinking of the distances involved, we're really looking back into the past. See, the light that's finally hitting our eyes was emitted that 2.5 million years ago. And scientists are predicting that it's headed this way - that our galaxy and Andromeda will (in the WAY distant future) combine into the awkwardly named "Milkdromeda" galaxy (I hope they come up with a better name than that by then...). Here's what it may look like:

Image result for andromeda galaxy

Which will make for some pretty amazing night skies. I won't be around to see it, but it looks awesome. Here's a video:


Which is impressive, but you've got to remember that this will take place over billions of years and that while it looks like two fairly densely packed regions interacting with one another, there's WAY more space in between each individual star. So chances are that we're going to be OK. As long as there's not some weird interaction between the two super massive black holes at the centers of each galaxy...

So, if each of these galaxies is moving towards one another, and is doing so at 268432 miles per hour (which is insane, but remember that we're 2.5 million light years apart, and one light year is nearly 6 trillion miles - so it's a very long way off) we're seeing stuff that happened a long time ago. But here's the thing, too. It's getting closer. I'm trying to think of a way to visualize what's happening.

Imagine you're 100 feet away from me, and I throw a ball towards you while at the same time walking towards you. Since I throw the ball much faster than I can walk, the ball reaches you before I do. However, I am not in the same position I was when I threw the ball - I've moved closer to you. But imagine that you can't see me or where I am, only where I was when I threw the ball. Do you have any idea how close I am to you? Scientists use shifts in the light spectrum to anticipate differences in speed and relative direction - things that are moving towards us have light that's compressed and shifted to the blue end of the spectrum, while things that are moving away from us shift to the red end of the spectrum. This is why, when I looked at the Andromeda Galaxy, it appears bluish to my eyes (it really did). Because the throwing of a ball is just one event, and light is emitted continuously from the stars in the galaxy, this shift is observable. It would be like me throwing balls at you continuously - as I got closer to you, the frequency at which the balls reached you would increase (they would have less distance to travel).


But what's killing me right now is that Andromeda is not where we see it - it's actually much closer than that. However, since our perception of it is limited by the speed of light, we'll never be able to know exactly where it is, only where it was, and perhaps something of it's speed relative to our position. And according to Einstein, perhaps even this is relative, because we're moving around in space and time as well...

So, you know. It's weird. And maybe I'm weird for thinking all these things... :)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...