Skip to main content

Asia

This morning I came across this article -

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2016/10/12/497063888/asian-americans-continue-to-drift-away-from-republicans-but-it-s-a-complicated-s

And I found it interesting. For a number of reasons.

Image result for Asia map

First off, let's try to define what "Asia" is. I think that those in Far East Asia consider themselves as "Asians", but where do you draw the line? Traditionally it's been the Ural Mountains, a roughly north to south mountain range that extend from the Arctic to the Aral Sea. That's all well and good, if you're looking at Russia - which is a vast, complex country that spans two continents. Are the Russians in the eastern part of the country Asian?

And there are countries that are considered part of Asia, but whose citizens are not like other "Asians" - India, Pakistan, Arabia, Farsi, and the whole "Middle East" deal, with it's Palestinians, Turks, Jews, Kurds, Iraqis, Jordanians, etc.... People don't often logically associate the Jews with the Chinese, or the Malay people with the Kazakhs... But they're all grouped in together. Never mind that the Philippines is a tropical island country and Nepal is the most elevated (literally and figuratively) country in the world. Never mind that the Arabs and the Japanese are vastly different peoples. These are all so very different that it's almost ridiculous to try to group them together, and it speaks to a racist past that in many ways and for many reasons needs to be put behind us.

How do we do this? I think the first step is understanding the inherent complexity in individuals, in cultures, in regions, in countries, and in the world overall. It's very strange to me that even in our post-modern society we want to group "Asians" into one category, even if they're American citizens. We do the same thing with Latinos, but at least they (for the most part) share a common (or similar) language and history, and even their religion is predominately Catholic, with all that that entails... These are people who represent four of the five major world's religions, but they're each vastly different. Buddhism is really not much like Islam, and Judaism is almost nothing like Hinduism. Throw Christianity into the mix and we've got as complex a system of beliefs as to make any attempt at trying to reconcile the differences a moot point.

And why would we try? Rather than looking at ways to consolidate people and their ideas into neat shoeboxes and pigeonholes, shouldn't we rather take a step back and enjoy the wonderful mosaic and strength and beauty that is inherent in such lovely diversity?

This graph from the article is what grabbed me:


I don't know why these were the groups that was picked, if they represent a certain percentage of the "Asian" population, and if these are just the ones likely to respond. The source information on the bottom is interesting - almost 2000 Asian-American and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (these are official Census racial designations, although they commonly get grouped together for reasons that simply defy understanding...). While you don't see the NHPI group represented in the graph, I wonder how many Koreans (for example) is considered a representative sample. Even assuming an even distribution of the population amongst the 8 groups of Asian-Americans, you're looking at 210 people from each nationality. I don't know how many Korean-Americans there are in the US, but is 210 a representative sample? Meaning, 106 people who responded and who are Korean-American said they vote Democrat, while 46 said independent and 48 said Republican... Is that representative? Is it even illustrative? I think it's misleading, and I think that it's damaging.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...