Skip to main content

How it works...

Going back to the idea of "social inequality", and in all humility acknowledging the benefits I've enjoyed in my life, I offer the following:



It seems to me that this is not about lowering expectations; rather, it's about raising them - for everyone. It's about acknowledging the disparity that exists, the fact that some are given much, while others are given little. It's about affording each an opportunity to succeed, regardless of station.

But this begs the question - how do we acknowledge someone's station without making that a defining factor? I read recently that there are folks who are suing a university because they felt discriminated against in favor of a minority admission. I'm not sure I'm smart enough to comment on the overall benefits/drawbacks of affirmative action or racial quotas or whatever. I really don't think I know enough. But what I do know is that I have experienced in my own life the benefits of being a white male from a relatively comfortable upbringing (both parents present, never much want or need, etc.) and it makes me frustrated that such things are the case. I don't mind having privilege (who would?!?) but the frustration comes due to the fact that my privilege is not based on merit, but is passively assigned by folks to me because I'm a tall white dude. Sigh. 

One of the things I appreciate most from the AICP (American Institute of City Planners - a professional organization to which I belong) Code of Ethics is the following:

We shall seek social justice by working to expand choice and opportunity for all persons, recognizing a special responsibility to plan for the needs of the disadvantaged and to promote racial and economic integration. We shall urge the alteration of policies, institutions, and decisions that oppose such needs. https://www.planning.org/ethics/ethicscode.htm

This probably deserves its own blog post, and I may someday. But suffice it to say at this point that this is something that I firmly agree with.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...