Skip to main content

Proscenium Arch

No one thinks in terms of a proscenium arch any more. Most folks go to a movie theater where they don't even bother covering the screen with a curtain - a practice that was anachronistic when it was a thing. The curtain pulling back to reveal the screen was symbolic of the entering into another world, the idea that we were being given a window into somewhere - sometimes far away, or a long time ago, or in a distant future. This was, of course, begun with stage productions, where there was actual scenery behind the curtain, and pulling back the curtain revealed exciting and tantalizing hints about what we were going to witness. The proscenium arch acted as a window frame for this experience, and they became works of art in their own right, like a gilded frame of a beautiful piece of art. Which, upon reflection, they are.


I really don't know much about acting or the theater arts in general. So it's with all humility that I discuss such things. One thing I have learned is how hard actors work. These men and women train and sweat and concentrate in ways that are almost incomprehensible for the lay person. They get into their roles, giving themselves emotionally to the part. 


I heard this morning that Alan Rickman had passed. This makes me really sad - sadder than when I'd heard that David Bowie died earlier this week. Because Alan Rickman was a GREAT actor. He made me feel very strong emotions, and that emotional connection is so very vital in acting. Only truly great actors can do this - most are nothing more than entertainers... They are interesting to watch, but there's no actual emotional connection, and this means that there's no investment in the production. It may still be entertaining, but not inspiring or moving. And that's what separates really great art from the mundane.

My first memory of Rickman was in Die Hard. My mother took me to see it at the dollar movie in Provo... It was a really fun film, and Rickman was awesome in it - totally believable as a villain, which was a part he was most often associated with.



This may be one of my favorite scenes that Rickman did. It's from Quigley Down Under, which is a kind of obscure film, but one of my favorites. Rickman is so slimy and slick and just drips with evil... And yet, he can get off an amusing quip - oh, and by the way, you're fired... - it's just so cleverly delivered that it comes off as something the villain would say - not cheesy or forced or awkward, just brilliant.



Then there was this role, the Sheriff of Nottingham, where again Rickman uses his oily, slick evil portrayal of someone who has completely lost all scruples. His psychotic nature is revealed in his eyes as soon as Robin opens the door, and the rage that is consuming him and fueling his hatred toward Robin Hood.



I don't want to gloss over his whimsical roles, like Galaxy Quest. He was a villain there, too, but the whole thing was more of a comic book film, and his character was silly and stereotypical. Rickman, as usual, nailed it.

But this may be my all-time favorite role for Rickman. Of all the actors in the film series, Rickman was the most believable. Forever in my mind, when I think of the Harry Potter books or hear Severus Snape speak as I read the books, Rickman is Snape, and Snape is Rickman. He's not truly as Rowling describes - in the books, Snape is thin and bat-like, while in the films Rickman's character is not that - he's more seductive and subtle in his evil. I think it plays better, honestly, with Rickman. This is my favorite scene:



And this is a close second:



So today, on the day of his passing, I'd like to thank Mr. Rickman for taking me - and so many others - through that proscenium arch, into worlds of darkness and whimsy and so much joy. You'll be missed, sir. God speed.

Comments

lillysmum said…
Although I love him in all the roles you mention (No more merciful beheadings!), my favourite will always be Colonel Brandon.

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...