Skip to main content

The End is Near!




OK, not really. :)

This morning, I read this:

http://www.bbc.com/earth/story/20150602-how-will-the-universe-end

I find the science behind this kind of exploration fascinating. Although, in order to be proved correct, one must exist at the end of the Universe to experience one of the posited phenomena, which would be impossible. So, there's no way to know - in the same way that there's no way to know what happened at the beginning. It's all just very interesting speculation.

One of the aspects of these theories that interests me is the idea of "dark matter" and/or "dark energy." The very definition of the stuff implies our inability to perceive or measure it, or interact with it in any way. But here's my question - if dark matter exists in the quantities they're saying it does, how is it that any other type of matter exists and can be perceived? Wouldn't the dark matter get in the way? Or perhaps it's bending the perceivable world around it, like the star which bends the light from the galaxy behind it to form a halo:


In this fashion:


Apparently, dark matter has a very weak gravitational field and therefore doesn't interact with the rest of the Universe in the same way that other matter does. Which is a little convenient... I mean, I realize this is all theoretical, and that because dark matter is not available for questioning, as it were, there's no way to get answers from it. It feels a bit like a cop-out, though - hey! there's something we can't understand, so let's invent something that will help explain our observations and fill in the gaps in our understanding/equations. Or, perhaps - there's something going on in nature that we can't fully understand. In order to try to understand it, let's invent a new kind of matter/energy to satisfy our equations.

It's not a little unlike how many world religions began. And persist. Attributing a supernatural explanation to otherwise inexplicable phenomena has been the realm of religious theory since people learned to make such attributions.

I personally believe in a world of both vast amounts of unknown phenomena and reasonable explanations for said phenomenon. I don't believe that there is anything unknowable. And I believe that religion and science are not opposites, but complimentary. All knowledge and truth exists, whether we attribute it to supernatural (or not currently understood) means, or whether we can measure, define, predict, and thus understand it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...