Skip to main content

Ah, English!

This is one of my favorite poems. It shows just how ridiculous it all is - ridiculously wonderful, and ridiculously frustrating, too. Here's a link:

http://ncf.idallen.com/english.html

The BBC wrote about spelling in English here:

http://www.bbc.com/culture/story/20150605-your-language-is-sinful

Which is a very clever article. Personally, I'm very grateful for the spell-check function in most word processing programs, and even on this web page. Because you know what? It's difficult... It really is.

There are no spelling tests in Korean. People hear the words exactly as they're written, so it would be pointless to do so. However, for foreign speakers of Korean, there are there are a few sounds that are difficult to differentiate - 어 and 오, for example. The first one is a kind of "uh", and is usually written in Latin letters as "eo". It is found in the name of the capital of South Korea Seoul (서울). Note that "Seoul" in Korean is two syllables - "Seo-ul", and not one like most westerners pronounce it, as if it sounded like "soul". I'd liken this sound to the schwa sound in English pronunciation. The second one is more of a true "oh" sound, sounding like the "oh" sound in "oak". It can be difficult to hear the difference between the two, and I frequently had to ask which was meant when I heard them. Even Koreans have trouble catching the subtle (almost non-existent) differences between 애 and 에. They're written in Latin letters as "ae" and "oe", respectively, but they sound exactly the same. Perhaps there was an earlier need for the different spellings, something that has been lost in the generations since the Korean writing system (Hangul - 한글) This can be problematic when compared with other diphthongs that have similar romanizations. Again, Koreans have trained their ears from the beginning of their lives to hear the subtle differences, but foreigners have a more difficult time.

Further, Korean has pronunciation strangeness that makes sense when you speak it, but does not do as well when it comes to writing it. This is also found in English - for example, the word "speak" is actually spoken as "sbeak", rhyming more accurately with "beak" than "peak". But no one actually says "s-peak", even though that's the way it's spelled. Korean has the same kind of thing. Kimchi (the spicy pickled cabbage dish that is always present at a Korean meal) is typically pronounced with a somewhat harder "k" sound with the "k" being in the initial position. In Korean, there are three "k" or "g" type consonants - ㅋ, ㄱ, and ㄲ. The first is a very hard "Kh" sound, like "KICK" or "bloCK". The second is interesting, because as I mentioned, it depends on it's relative position in the syllable or word. If it is the initial "k" sound, it is a definite "k", although softer than the hard "Kh". If it is anywhere else in the word, it is a softer "g" sound, as in "golf". But Koreans cannot hear the difference between these harder "k" and softer "g" sounds, any more than we can hear someone really say "sbeak" when they're saying "speak" (although, now that I've pointed it out to you, you'll probably notice it). To Koreans, saying "kimchi" is indistinguishable from saying "gimchi", which is how it is romanized in other places. Foreigners who have not been desensitized to such pronunciations can definitely hear the difference, though. The last "k" of the series of three is a difficult one for foreigners, too. It's a "gg" sound, much stronger than the "g", but only in terms of volume. So, 가 is pronounced "ga", while "까" is pronounced "Ga!" or "gga!".

There are sounds that Koreans have to train themselves to use, such as "z", "f". "v", "th", and "see" (they say "sh-ee", and have a hard time with "see"). They also have a hard time with length of vowels, which can be problematic when saying words like "sheet" and "beach".

Anyway, the vagaries of language are fascinating to me. :) Yep. Geek.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...