Skip to main content

What's not funny...

Trump recently made a comment that was probably meant as some kind of a joke or other light-hearted comment, but was really quite troubling:



Now, I'm familiar with saying stuff that I thought would be funny but it turns out to not be. I've even offended people unwittingly in my effort to be clever. And it's embarrassing. But here's the thing - I'm not running for president, and I would never, EVER suggest that violence is an answer to a problem.

Two things. First, there are people who follow Trump that are crazy. Not all, but some. And they may take his suggestion as something their leader has implied that they should accomplish. (Will no one rid me of this troublesome priest?) (Not that I'm comparing Mrs. Clinton to Thomas Becket - just the off-hand remark which maybe wasn't intended to mean what it sounded like, but which could be interpreted to MEAN JUST THAT...) The second amendment has preserved the right to bear arms, which in this context means to "defend" one's self from threats. Well, if Mrs. Clinton is viewed as enough of a threat....................

Yeah. Not good.

Second, I wonder if Trump would have had the same response if his opponent were a man. There is a lot (!) of violence towards women that is both latent and apparent in our society, and it is one of the most damning aspects of the prevalent sexism that persists, in spite of glass ceilings being shattered. I'm not saying Trump is intentionally sexist (even though he is) in this remark; rather, what I'm saying is that he's pandering to a crowd that AGREES with him - look at the applause and head-nodding he gets as he extols the virtues of the NRA and the gun-totin' agenda... And that it's sexist in effect if not in intent.

I've written a couple of times about how a gun is not for DEFENSE - it's for offense. A gun doesn't make you safer, it just means that you can retaliate when someone has aggrieved you. Guns are inherently and explicitly and singularly violent creations - their only function is to destroy, maim, and kill. And when Trump says that the second amendment people (whatever that means!) could take care of this... Well, it's clear that he's looking for action against a woman. Which ought to scare people to death, the way it does me.

Perhaps on some level he knows that is the only way he'd win - if something tragic and violent were to happen...

I just can't (CAN'T)(!!!) believe that this guy is the leader of the Republican party. I can't. I can't wrap my mind around the fact that someone like this has been chosen to be a candidate for president, with a shot (hopefully rather distant) at actually becoming the leader of our country, the commander in chief of the military... The diplomatic face of our country around the world...

I can't believe it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...
Post a Comment
Read more

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...
4 comments
Read more

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...
18 comments
Read more