Skip to main content

Sneakers

So one of my favorite movies is Sneakers. In it, Robert Redford plays Martin Bryce, the leader of a team of security testers. They try to break into banks' computer systems to test the firewalls and safety procedures. It's pointed out that it's a living, but not a very good one.

In Martin's past, he and a friend had hacked into one domain too many in a subversive attempt to do something (it's never really explained, but I've always thought it was a more stealthy Edward Snowden job, only back in the late 70s or whenever). Martin is able to escape because he went out for pizza, while his buddy was captured and went to prison. Martin spends the interim on the lam, setting up this business of sneaking into banks and testing security.

His friend gets out of prison and sets up a successful shell corporation to mask his ties to the mob. In his heart though, this friend has never given up on the fascination with the way the information is handled, packaged, and presented to the public. The line goes - it's all about the information. Here's the scene:




So, I thought about this in the context of yesterday's Supreme Court Decision.

This is very frightening to me, because we have long known that politicians are beholden to their contributors for funding. Super PACs, lobbyists, unions, and many organizations have access to a LOT of money. It's really unfathomable. Some of these are funded by sources outside of the US. Some of them are in direct opposition to one another, which makes for some interesting wrangling. But quietly, and with Supreme Court approval, we find that the money (now unlimited) is really what controls the game. Thus the amount of power that those of us who don't have as much money - which, let's be honest, is an incredibly small fraction of one percent - has been significantly reduced.

But, Bill! You object... What about freedom of speech? What about those who are legitimately represented by the Super PACs they subscribe to? What about unions? What about the "Save the Endangered Trees" lobby? Aren't they all good things? They represent real people, and their collective will is much more powerful than any one person...

Perhaps. But what I fear is the disenfranchisement of the one. I fear the plutocracy that appears to be forming in our society, no matter how benevolent. And I fear that the information we receive has been filtered and prepared for us in spoon-sized 30 second sound bites that provide no real information at all. Like living on marshmallows. I love marshmallows. But you can't live on them.

I'm worried that the world we live in is being carefully crafted for us by a very few rich folks. They give us our coliseum of games, our weekly rations of wheat and wine, and laud the successes of our society. And we like it. Because we don't have to think.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...