Skip to main content

Syria

I've been following with some interest the events taking place in Syria. I don't like the way things are shaping up. It was easier to understand before the chemical weapons were used. Now, it's gone to a whole new and unpleasant level. Not that war is ever pleasant, mind. But weapons of mass destruction? The use of those kinds of weapons is just beyond the pale.

I know. The US dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I know about the incendiary bombs used in WWII and subsequent conflicts. I know about the Agent Orange and napalm and all the rest. I also know that the US is one of the few countries on earth that still hasn't signed the landmine treaty. I also acknowledge the fact that a couple of young men piloting a drone from thousands of miles away can deliver weapons on target in a way that jeopardizes only the targets (and those unfortunates who happen to be in the area). That last one bothers me in a way that none of the rest do, frankly. There's just something obscene about it.

The American Civil War was the first truly modern war. Up to that point, war had really changed little from the time Caesar crossed the Rubicon. With the advent of rapidly reloading weapons, enhanced ballistics, and high explosives, the death toll was really like nothing we'd ever seen. Up to that point, the dead and wounded were numbered in the thousands (not to downplay the significance of any casualty, of course). But in the Civil War, things changed. Now we numbered the dead in hundreds of thousands. WWII was the costliest war, with over a million US lives affected (wounded or killed). The Civil War remains the costliest, however, in terms of overall population. Nearly 2 percent of the population perished. Further, there were nearly 600 deaths per day, while in WWII there were nearly 400.

Now, thanks to superior firepower and defensive measures, the war on terror has claimed only about 1 1/2 lives per day. Again, I don't wish to downplay the significance of any life lost - each is precious and valuable, and the loss is really immeasurable. But our modern warfare is very different, at least on our side. Which is good for us.

And not so good for the opposing force.

But what does this mean for us, in a geopolitical sense? The middle east is, and has ever been, a complete hotbed of contention. Nations fighting over tiny bits of land FOREVER. Religions feeling like they have a divine mandate to exterminate all opposition. People growing up in environments of hatred and malice towards one another, all within such an incredibly close proximity, and all for such an incredibly long time...

It's difficult to fathom, really.

Russia doesn't want us there, but its motives are not clear and therefore suspect. The Arab League apparently favors some sort of intervention, but what and how long? And how will Iran and other countries feel about that? Will they use this as an excuse to attack Israel, which they are spoiling to do anyway?

Hence the need and desire to stay out of these kinds of imbroglios in the first place.

I don't know what's going to happen. I wish Pres. Obama hadn't said the line about, well, the line. Although it's clear that he had to say something, and that he's being pressured to take a stance, it makes it now our place to do something, or appear ineffective. Besides, using chemical weapons on one's own citizens really is beyond the pale.

Sigh.

It's going to be interesting.


Comments

lillysmum said…
Syria is a mess. The whole Middle East is a mess. My gut instinct is that we should stay strictly out of it, but how can we? There are so many possible repercussions to getting involved and an equal number of staying out of things. Our own country is a bit of a mess, who are we to poke our noses into someone else's business, but on the other hand, there are lines we can't allow to be crossed, right? We can't just sit back and watch them destroy themselves. Crimes against humanity and all that. I don't know, really.
In other news, I KNEW that clip would be there.
Bill Cobabe said…
Of course that clip would be there. And naturally you knew it would. ;)

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...