Skip to main content

Syria

I've been following with some interest the events taking place in Syria. I don't like the way things are shaping up. It was easier to understand before the chemical weapons were used. Now, it's gone to a whole new and unpleasant level. Not that war is ever pleasant, mind. But weapons of mass destruction? The use of those kinds of weapons is just beyond the pale.

I know. The US dropped the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. I know about the incendiary bombs used in WWII and subsequent conflicts. I know about the Agent Orange and napalm and all the rest. I also know that the US is one of the few countries on earth that still hasn't signed the landmine treaty. I also acknowledge the fact that a couple of young men piloting a drone from thousands of miles away can deliver weapons on target in a way that jeopardizes only the targets (and those unfortunates who happen to be in the area). That last one bothers me in a way that none of the rest do, frankly. There's just something obscene about it.

The American Civil War was the first truly modern war. Up to that point, war had really changed little from the time Caesar crossed the Rubicon. With the advent of rapidly reloading weapons, enhanced ballistics, and high explosives, the death toll was really like nothing we'd ever seen. Up to that point, the dead and wounded were numbered in the thousands (not to downplay the significance of any casualty, of course). But in the Civil War, things changed. Now we numbered the dead in hundreds of thousands. WWII was the costliest war, with over a million US lives affected (wounded or killed). The Civil War remains the costliest, however, in terms of overall population. Nearly 2 percent of the population perished. Further, there were nearly 600 deaths per day, while in WWII there were nearly 400.

Now, thanks to superior firepower and defensive measures, the war on terror has claimed only about 1 1/2 lives per day. Again, I don't wish to downplay the significance of any life lost - each is precious and valuable, and the loss is really immeasurable. But our modern warfare is very different, at least on our side. Which is good for us.

And not so good for the opposing force.

But what does this mean for us, in a geopolitical sense? The middle east is, and has ever been, a complete hotbed of contention. Nations fighting over tiny bits of land FOREVER. Religions feeling like they have a divine mandate to exterminate all opposition. People growing up in environments of hatred and malice towards one another, all within such an incredibly close proximity, and all for such an incredibly long time...

It's difficult to fathom, really.

Russia doesn't want us there, but its motives are not clear and therefore suspect. The Arab League apparently favors some sort of intervention, but what and how long? And how will Iran and other countries feel about that? Will they use this as an excuse to attack Israel, which they are spoiling to do anyway?

Hence the need and desire to stay out of these kinds of imbroglios in the first place.

I don't know what's going to happen. I wish Pres. Obama hadn't said the line about, well, the line. Although it's clear that he had to say something, and that he's being pressured to take a stance, it makes it now our place to do something, or appear ineffective. Besides, using chemical weapons on one's own citizens really is beyond the pale.

Sigh.

It's going to be interesting.


Comments

lillysmum said…
Syria is a mess. The whole Middle East is a mess. My gut instinct is that we should stay strictly out of it, but how can we? There are so many possible repercussions to getting involved and an equal number of staying out of things. Our own country is a bit of a mess, who are we to poke our noses into someone else's business, but on the other hand, there are lines we can't allow to be crossed, right? We can't just sit back and watch them destroy themselves. Crimes against humanity and all that. I don't know, really.
In other news, I KNEW that clip would be there.
Bill Cobabe said…
Of course that clip would be there. And naturally you knew it would. ;)

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...