Skip to main content

Political Police

I usually save my political rantings for my other blog. But this one has got me irked, and since it is more partisan in nature, I will leave my thoughts here rather than vent them in the more public forum that is my City Planner's Blog.

According to the official LDS website:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is neutral in matters of party politics.

The Church does not:
  • Endorse, promote or oppose political parties, candidates or platforms.
  • Allow its church buildings, membership lists or other resources to be used for partisan political purposes.
  • Attempt to direct its members as to which candidate or party they should give their votes to. This policy applies whether or not a candidate for office is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
  • Attempt to direct or dictate to a government leader.

The Church does:

  • Encourage its members to play a role as responsible citizens in their communities, including becoming informed about issues and voting in elections.
  • Expect its members to engage in the political process in an informed and civil manner, respecting the fact that members of the Church come from a variety of backgrounds and experiences and may have differences of opinion in partisan political matters.
  • Request candidates for office not to imply that their candidacy or platforms are endorsed by the Church.
  • Reserve the right as an institution to address, in a nonpartisan way, issues that it believes have significant community or moral consequences or that directly affect the interests of the Church.

Elected officials who are Latter-day Saints make their own decisions and may not necessarily be in agreement with one another or even with a publicly stated Church position. While the Church may communicate its views to them, as it may to any other elected official, it recognizes that these officials still must make their own choices based on their best judgment and with consideration of the constituencies whom they were elected to represent.

I don't understand why it is (and maybe someone can explain this to me) that there is a pervasive feeling among members of the Church that there is only one party, and it is the Republican Party, for church members. I have even had someone say that they would question seriously the credentials and testimony of anyone who is not a Republican. I am NOT a Republican. Nor am I a Democrat. I am liberal in some of my thinking, and in other ways I am very conservative, almost libertarian. I dislike government involvement in many aspects of my life, but things that pertain to universal governance, including transportation, commerce, etc, must be regulated for the benefit of all. This involves some intrusion on my personal freedoms.

As soon as someone thinks I am a democrat or republican, they think things about me that may not be true. I am unique. I think. I feel. I am independent and complex. And I am open to change my ideas based on new and pertinent information. I despise the thought "I have already made up my mind - don't confuse me with the facts" which seems so pervasive...

I want to know what others think. I want my mind to be filled with as much knowledge as possible so that when it comes time for me to make my decisions I can do it from a position of power instead of from a position of reliance and submission. I want to use that knowledge and power to expand others. In working together on our problems, we can reach for places and things that we have never had before.

So I am a DemoPublican. Or a Republicrat. Or better yet, I am Bill. Just Bill. Talk to me. I want to know what you think and why.

Comments

LivingstonClan said…
Not that your passionate about it in anyway. I think that one of the HUGE divider issues is abortion. I know you are not an advocate, but the Democratic party sooms to be know for it, it being that it is Pro-Choice, or whatever. There are always going to be small minded people out there who make small minded comments, you just have to learn to let it roll right off your back. It's funny that Religiong & Politics are two topics that get people so heated. I will be happy when this is all over, and I just hope our country is better off with whomever wins. That's all I have to say about that. I love you! Where are the destruction pictures anyway?
Bill Cobabe said…
Yeah, I read that article in the Ensign about abortion. It's so sad. I hate abortion... I have known a girl who had an abortion and she cried for hours. I don't know what to do about it, though. Once something becomes OK how can you suddenly say "well, sorry. I guess we can't do that anymore" especially when people are such idiots about it?

The destruction pics didn't turn out the way I hoped - they're way to big... Besides, the really scary stuff all happened when it was dark, so no pics... I will try to figure out a way to shrink it down or put it on YouTube or something.

I love you to. You're the only one who comments. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...