Skip to main content

Political Police

I usually save my political rantings for my other blog. But this one has got me irked, and since it is more partisan in nature, I will leave my thoughts here rather than vent them in the more public forum that is my City Planner's Blog.

According to the official LDS website:

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is neutral in matters of party politics.

The Church does not:
  • Endorse, promote or oppose political parties, candidates or platforms.
  • Allow its church buildings, membership lists or other resources to be used for partisan political purposes.
  • Attempt to direct its members as to which candidate or party they should give their votes to. This policy applies whether or not a candidate for office is a member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
  • Attempt to direct or dictate to a government leader.

The Church does:

  • Encourage its members to play a role as responsible citizens in their communities, including becoming informed about issues and voting in elections.
  • Expect its members to engage in the political process in an informed and civil manner, respecting the fact that members of the Church come from a variety of backgrounds and experiences and may have differences of opinion in partisan political matters.
  • Request candidates for office not to imply that their candidacy or platforms are endorsed by the Church.
  • Reserve the right as an institution to address, in a nonpartisan way, issues that it believes have significant community or moral consequences or that directly affect the interests of the Church.

Elected officials who are Latter-day Saints make their own decisions and may not necessarily be in agreement with one another or even with a publicly stated Church position. While the Church may communicate its views to them, as it may to any other elected official, it recognizes that these officials still must make their own choices based on their best judgment and with consideration of the constituencies whom they were elected to represent.

I don't understand why it is (and maybe someone can explain this to me) that there is a pervasive feeling among members of the Church that there is only one party, and it is the Republican Party, for church members. I have even had someone say that they would question seriously the credentials and testimony of anyone who is not a Republican. I am NOT a Republican. Nor am I a Democrat. I am liberal in some of my thinking, and in other ways I am very conservative, almost libertarian. I dislike government involvement in many aspects of my life, but things that pertain to universal governance, including transportation, commerce, etc, must be regulated for the benefit of all. This involves some intrusion on my personal freedoms.

As soon as someone thinks I am a democrat or republican, they think things about me that may not be true. I am unique. I think. I feel. I am independent and complex. And I am open to change my ideas based on new and pertinent information. I despise the thought "I have already made up my mind - don't confuse me with the facts" which seems so pervasive...

I want to know what others think. I want my mind to be filled with as much knowledge as possible so that when it comes time for me to make my decisions I can do it from a position of power instead of from a position of reliance and submission. I want to use that knowledge and power to expand others. In working together on our problems, we can reach for places and things that we have never had before.

So I am a DemoPublican. Or a Republicrat. Or better yet, I am Bill. Just Bill. Talk to me. I want to know what you think and why.

Comments

LivingstonClan said…
Not that your passionate about it in anyway. I think that one of the HUGE divider issues is abortion. I know you are not an advocate, but the Democratic party sooms to be know for it, it being that it is Pro-Choice, or whatever. There are always going to be small minded people out there who make small minded comments, you just have to learn to let it roll right off your back. It's funny that Religiong & Politics are two topics that get people so heated. I will be happy when this is all over, and I just hope our country is better off with whomever wins. That's all I have to say about that. I love you! Where are the destruction pictures anyway?
Bill Cobabe said…
Yeah, I read that article in the Ensign about abortion. It's so sad. I hate abortion... I have known a girl who had an abortion and she cried for hours. I don't know what to do about it, though. Once something becomes OK how can you suddenly say "well, sorry. I guess we can't do that anymore" especially when people are such idiots about it?

The destruction pics didn't turn out the way I hoped - they're way to big... Besides, the really scary stuff all happened when it was dark, so no pics... I will try to figure out a way to shrink it down or put it on YouTube or something.

I love you to. You're the only one who comments. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

Is this thing still on?

 Does anyone even blog anymore? I remember when it first got started and everyone was having a blog. I like writing, and I do a lot of it in my professional life, but not everything makes it onto this blog, which is where a lot of my personal thoughts come out. I put more into Facebook lately, too, because it's a little easier. But there's something to be said for this long-form writing exercise, and I think I will continue here periodically. You don't mind, do you? Well, in my last post I wrote about how difficult things were for me at the time. That changed in July when I finally got a job working for the State of Utah. I was the program manager for the moderate income housing database program, and that meant I worked from home a lot but also went in to Salt Lake when needed, mostly on the train. It was a good experience, for the most part, and I'm grateful for the things I learned even in the short time I was there.  In October I started working for Weber County in t...

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

A Romantic Encounter

Him (tears in his eyes, heartbroken): I want you to know that I love you, that I'm sorry for my weakness and frailties, and that I will try and do better. I think I am doing better than I was before, and I just want to please you and make you happy. I am very grateful for your continued patience as I try to be the kind of man I want to be. Her: You need a haircut. It's getting a little long.