Skip to main content

Party on, Wayne!

Read this article this morning:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/27/opinions/trump-not-causing-gop-exodus-obeidallah/index.html

It's a rather fascinating insight into the dissolution of the Republican Party. Here's a couple of quotes I found particularly interesting:

Trump didn't persuade the GOP base to embrace his extreme and at times bigoted views -- he didn't have to. Those views match up well with what the rank and file of today's Republican Party already believes.
...
Win or lose, Trump will come and go -- but his views truly represent a solid majority of today's Republican Party. The bigger question for Republicans like Rep. Love, Romney, Paulson, and others is: do they try to change the GOP from within or is time for them to find a new political party?


I don't have any idea what I would do if I were a Republican, but I am sure that I would feel increasingly that the Republican Party didn't represent my views. This was a conclusion that I came to a long time ago when I decided that I just couldn't be associated with the kind of stances that I see many Republicans taking on different issues, such as economics/taxation and the way the poor should be treated. The fringe issues of immigration and national security and gun control were not really that big of a deal in my mind, but they have become more important as the years have gone by and my understanding and position has changed. Further, some dear friends have awakened me to the importance of women's rights issues, and I think that there are few issues that are more important.

So the question becomes - how loyal should one be to a particular political party? How closely does a political party reflect my views? I consider myself to be somewhat of a centrist, seeking a rational, measured approach to issues, and I find that in the Democratic Party on most issues that I'm concerned about. But that doesn't mean I can't or don't support a candidate or platform that is outside of the Democratic Party. For example, I'd be in favor of a third party, garnering say 10% of the vote, such that no other party has a clear majority and must work with the others. I think this might go a long way towards mutual understanding and getting things done. But that's not a Democratic Party idea.

In short, I find myself bemused by those who continue to blindly support a particular party at the expense of personally held values. If the Republican Party doesn't represent my views, perhaps it's time to align myself with another party. Or maybe create a new party...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...