Skip to main content

You don't have to live like a refugee

- Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers

So I had this conversation the other day about the refugee thing. I said I would be honored to welcome refugees into my home. The guy I was speaking with said I was nuts and putting my family at risk. He said that 70% of the refugees are single men, and 10% of them are terrorists. Now, I'm not sure where he's getting his facts, but it didn't take me long to discover that he was absolutely wrong in the first case (it's just a little less than half of the refugees that are male, and half of the refugees are under the age of 18). And I also believe there's no way to know the validity of the second assertion. Just no way to know that.

He put it this way - let's say you had ten people lined up and you had to choose amongst them, knowing that one of them is a terrorist who has sworn to kill you and your family. How would you pick which ones you'd take in? I said that it was simple. I'd just take the first two on the left. He was stunned.

Because two thoughts occur to me. The first thought is that if we allow terrorists to change the way we treat one another, especially when people are in need, the we have truly lost. And perhaps we were never really converted to the religious ideals we espouse/claim. Christ told the person who was surprised to be accepted into heaven and wondered about his qualifications - inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me. What were these qualifications? Look at Matthew 25 -

35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:
36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

Now, stranger is an interesting word in the Bible, with a complex set of meanings. While it carries the current meaning of someone who is unknown to you, it also means one who is far from home, who is not of the same culture or religion, and who may be seeking asylum. Essentially, a refugee.

The other thought that occurs to me is that the only way to change someone's mind, particularly a mind full of hate and malice and ill-intent, is to love and serve that person. Maybe I'm just naive enough to believe that there is power in such things, more than in destruction and violence. If we deny refugees a place to stay, are we not validating their prejudices and preconceived notions? How else are we to change these notions?

I believe what King Benjamin said about doing things in wisdom and order, that it is not prudent to run faster than we have strength. But I really do have extra room in my house and would be honored to have it taken up by people who don't have anywhere else to go. I also loved the example of the Nephites toward the Ammonites, where they were refugees, and the Nephites gave them the land of Jershon as a place to live. We have tons of places here they could go. Why not?

Why not?

Comments

Bill Cobabe said…
PS - I also said, let's imagine the year is 1838 and you're a Mormon living in Missouri. The Prophet was in jail and the Governor had just signed the extermination order. You have to leave or die. Where would you go? You don't share the religion of people in the area, and they have great reason to assume that you are dangerous. What would you do?

Quincy, Illinois took those people in, sheltered, fed, and helped them in many ways. The parallels are striking. But that wasn't the only time that happened. After they'd killed the Prophet in 1844, and were told by the US government that although the cause was just nothing could be done, the Mormons were expelled again, this time from Nauvoo. The people of Quicy stood tall again, showing their real values and what they believed in.

Maybe it's time to return the favor.
lillysmum said…
Kindred spirits, you and I. I love this.

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...