Skip to main content

On Culture and Religion

So, I'm interested in the idea that there's a difference between "culture" and "religion". For the purposes of this interest, and to help delineate my thoughts, I'm defining "culture" as a set of societal beliefs, practices, and/or norms that a group of people evolve over time that helps to provide identity and shared experience, while "religion" I will define as faith-based beliefs. practices, and/or norms that are informed by a canon of scripture or other prophetic/inspired teachings. Religious practices and beliefs may also change over time, but tend to be more true to a basic set of core values, such as an authority figure/deity, while cultural practices are more organic and vernacular.

Both are important, and many times they're related, but one should not be mistaken for another. For example, if one were to view a cultural practice in Utah - that of bringing cheesy baked potato casserole to a funeral (they're even called "funeral potatoes") - one might come to believe that this was some sort of religious practice or sacrament. One might even argue the relative qualities of the different kinds of toppings (corn flakes, potato chips, or - I even got crazy once and did nacho cheese Doritos). But, however related this may seem to a religious occurrence, it is not part of the Mormon religion.

I think it's unfortunate when people confuse "culture" for "religion". As another example of what I'm talking about, there are people who belong to a certain political party. They are the majority in Utah, and their conservative views tend to fit well with people and their culture. There are others, however, who do not belong to the same political party - or to any political party - and whose views do not necessarily jive with the others and their party. These views are influenced - on both parts - by their religious beliefs, but there is a difference (or there should be a difference) between what people accept as an article of faith, or a religious belief, and a political party. One should be careful of subscribing wholesale to the views of a political party because in doing so one may abrogate one's responsibility to vote one's conscience. This is true of both political parties and of people in general. Just because one political party is predominant in an area, or seems to fit well with a particular culture, does not mean that the party represents either the culture or religion.

Interestingly, my religious beliefs have led me to the non-majority party in Utah. Further, I feel that at times the dominant culture in Utah serves to push me away from that majority party. I have been told that no good LDS person could be a Democrat. And I find that discouraging, because as noted above, there is a difference between cultural and religious norms and mores. By discouraging the exploration and even the existence of differing points of view, we are quelling the dissent and dissonance that is so necessary in growing new and better ideas. In order to plant, one must first plow the soil. While this is an invasive and sometimes painful experience, the growth that can occur is desirable.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...