Skip to main content

95 of 19

Today is the 95th year since the adoption of the 19th Amendment, where women were (finally) granted the right to vote in national elections. Several states had done this previously, with Wyoming being the first in 1867, followed fairly soon thereafter by Utah in 1870. Utah was one of only four states that gave the vote to women prior to 1900... So, you know, go Utah!

In light of how this has worked out so wonderfully (and of course it has!), maybe it's time (again) to think about an Equal Rights Amendment. Maybe we should have a law that requires employment and access to health care and everything else be a matter of personhood, rather than something that is gender-influenced or gender-related... Why don't people of different races get the same pay? Why are there persistent issues with LBGTQ access to housing, employment, etc? And why should someone face discrimination because of a different chromosome?

You bet I'm in favor of it.

Comments

Anonymous said…
First of all, I'm all for the 19th Amendment and womens' right to vote. ERA, however, is a completely different story. The lie that liberals tell that women do not make as much money as men is just that--a complete lie. It's sad that you keep propogating lies instead of searching for the truth--for Jesus said, "The Truth Shall Set You Free."
Do you know what happened in France last weekend? Everybody in that train ran for the hills except some American men. What you had in the rescue effort on that train was American maleness. You had American -- what used to be universal, worldwide manliness -- masculinity on display. Heroics were performed; people were saved. The situation was diffused, while people ran for the tall grass. The people that ran for the tall grass are the people have been indoctrinated by political correctness. Men who are shamed into not being men, men who have been henpecked into denying their maleness and masculinity on the basis that it is predatory. This is all in relation to your wonderful Equal Rights.
And sadly, what we saw yesterday in Virginia is one of the end-of-the-road results of this kind of government overreach. It's mandatory minority hiring, along with mandatory female hiring. Merit was thrown out in many cases. Many qualified men who had been in broadcasting for years lost their jobs in the early 1970s, just get fired for no reason other the federal government was mandating that a certain percentage of on-air jobs be held by women and African-Americans. It is no longer, "Whose the best man (or woman) for the job?" in America. It is now, "Is there a woman or minority we can put in the job, even if they are less qualified than that white man?" So you ended up having qualified people summarily fired simply to make room for what were required by government to be minority hires. They had to. And you are really OK with that? If you do any research at all about the Virginia shooter yesterday, he was an awful reporter. He had no skill, no talent, and did not take correction well. But his superiors kept him on far too long, because they were scared that if they fired him they would be deemed racist. And guess what? He felt that he was fired because of his race, and he got his revenge by shooting three innocent people, before killing himself. This was all started by the ERA. Too bad you think it's such a great idea, cause it's awful!
Bill Cobabe said…
Anymouse - I almost didn't publish your comment, but then decided to man up and show how ridiculous your comment is. How can anyone logically say that male dominance or superiority is beneficial to anyone? It's a notion that has had its life and has failed, like the idea that people can be property and that only people who own land should vote. Times change and awareness increases. I have hope even for you, anymouse.

Popular posts from this blog

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

Lucky!

So Tomorrow is Amie's birthday. The 12 th is Andy's. The 14 th is Alex's. And the 26 th is mom's. Happy birthday everyone. I recently found that a member of our ward has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer has a survivability rate of less than 5% and you never, ever kick it, even if you live. Once diagnosed, people are expected to live about six months. My wife and I were talking about this wonderful woman. There are very few (too few) people in this world who shine. Literally. This sister shines with a light that is perceptible and discernible . The world will literally be a darker place without her in it. Life is short, folks. Too short for hard feelings, too short for pain and misunderstanding. I love you all so much. Sorry this one is such a downer... I don't mean to be lugubrious on your birthdays... I consider myself lucky to be your brother. You have and continue to bless me and my family in many ways, for which I will be eternally gra...

Excommunication

My heart is heavy this morning. I read that Kate Kelly and others are being brought up on Church disciplinary action. For those who are unfamiliar with the process/proceedings of LDS Church discipline, it can be a bit mystifying. There are several levels of censure that the Church may impose. These range from a simple removal of some privileges for a short period of time to the most severe action - excommunication. When one is excommunicated, the person's membership in the Church is terminated. It is a very extreme measure, and for the faithful it can be a very difficult thing to consider. What people don't understand - what is nearly impossible for someone outside the proceedings to understand - is the amount of love felt. It's discipline. It's intended to be harsh (at times). And it's intended to be unpleasant. But it is done with love and care for the person. Since excommunication is such an extreme measure, it is really only very rarely applied. There are ...