Skip to main content

Salary Parity

Why do men make more than women for performing the same work? Assuming the same qualifications and the same performance standards, men consistently and across almost the whole spectrum of occupations make more than women. I have no logical reason why this should be the case. I really have no illogical reason either, other than persistent, latent sexism.

The pope recently said that this disparity amounted to a "scandal" and that Christians should "decisively support equal pay for equal work." Seems like a no-brainer, doesn't it? And yet...

Here's a link to the Reuters article about it:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/29/us-pope-women-salaries-idUSKBN0NK1J520150429

I wish more political, religious, and other community and business leaders would take such a stance. While equal pay is just one aspect of the problems related to sexism, it is clear that it is one area that could easily be fixed, and one that would have an immediate benefit to the whole economy, not to mention the relative position of women in our society.

Women are worth more than the $0.77 they make relative to the men's full dollar. Shucks, everyone deserves to earn the full dollar, regardless of gender. I really can't understand why this is even a thing.

Comments

lillysmum said…
Well, although the parity is less pronounced within the same job, and that some of the reason for the wage gap is that women choose less lucrative fields as a general rule, the big part of the problem comes from the fact that those less lucrative career choices are often culturally viewed as "women's work." So, the big question is, WHY do we value women's work so little?
Because women have been seen for so long as appendages to men.
Anonymous said…
RIDICULOUS! This is such a made up non-issue by the left! NONE of what you wrote above can be proven. On the contrary, it can be proven that for women under the age of 45, when employment type and hours worked are taken into account, the pay gap is completely non-existent. The current obsession with the gender pay gap bears only a passing relationship to reality. In the past few months, several news stories have focused on how the gender pay gap has narrowed as young women out-earn mean, and mothers' pay has risen faster than fathers'. When the total earned by ALL men is compared with the total earned by ALL women, there are indeed disparities. But anyone with half a brain and not trying to make an issue out of a non-issue can look at the reasons behind those statistics: 1) People nearing retirement age today entered the labor market in an era when fewer women went to college and when it was neither so acceptable or so practically easy for women to work full-time once they had started a family. 2) It also points to the fact that men were more likely to work full-time, and keep working full-time, even when children came along, than women. Even today, when women have children, many decide to not work at all (exactly what our church teaches), or to work only part-time; those who do work full-time many decide not to apply for a promotion because of all the extra work it might entail, or not to clock up all the extra hours needed to qualify for a bonus. Instead, they choose to spend that extra time on their children and family.
Perhaps you should spend your time and effort praising the women you know who choose to not have a career, but instead choose to stay home and raise their families up unto the Lord, rather than jump on the error-ridden political bandwagon of the left and stir up trouble where none in reality exists.
Bill Cobabe said…
If it is such a non-issue, why would the Pope call it a "scandal"? I'm quite flabbergasted that anyone can look at the situation and not realize it for what it is. You're either terribly ignorant or naive. And your comment about raising families unto he Lord has nothing to do with this thread and is a complete straw man. So save your vitriol for your right wing comfort zone. I'm sure you will find many who will love to lap it up.

Popular posts from this blog

Ephesus

Paul got around. Ephesus is right on the Aegean Sea, on the coast of present-day Turkey. Yesterday he was in Galatia, which was much more towards the middle of Turkey. And when he actually wrote these letters, he was in Rome... So the man could travel. He probably walked. Today's item of interest comes from chapter one in Ephesians. Verses 18 and 19 are particularly interesting: 18 The eyes of your understanding being enlightened; that ye may know what is the hope of his calling and what the riches of the glory of his inheritance in the saints, 19 And what is the exceeding greatness of his power to us-ward who believe, according to the working of his mighty power This is not the first time Paul talks about an inheritance. In Galatians he talks about the inheritance that comes of being part of the Abrahamic Covenant. He notes that we are joint-heirs through and with Christ. In Ephesians, he uses the word "adoption" - that we are adopted as the Children of Jesus Chris...

Engaged

Three Dog Night got it wrong.  One is not the loneliest number. They were more accurate when they said Two can be as bad as one.  I really wonder how people can survive Without being fully engaged. How they live through each day Without the intimacy I so very much crave... Maybe I am unusual in my desire  To have this intimacy, To want to feel that soul So close to my own Sharing light and warmth, Sharing love and passion, Sharing life. Alas! Alas! Alas! For when I do seek to share It is often only to be rebuffed Denied Or used up, Sucked dry, And left an empty husk.  I want SO MUCH to share And all I have is the cold, digital world Of typing out a blog.

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...