Skip to main content

The nature of love

So...

What is love?

What is love, really?

I mean, really... What is it?

I have recently come to understand that there are many kinds of love, two of which I'd like to explore a bit in this post.

The first looks at the loved person and notices the flaws. This person cannot tolerate the flaws thus seen, and out of a sense of love and duty and respect and a sincere desire to be helpful and loving offers gentle but insistent comments/critiques/criticisms. Regardless of the reason for the fault, and regardless of the pain inflicted on the loved person by this critique, this person loves others too much to allow such to continue. Trust and love is conditioned/extended based on the compliance and adaptation to the critique.

The second looks at the loved person and notices flaws. But the second person chooses to ignore many/most of the flaws. The person loves without reservation or concern for imperfections - indeed, loves because of the imperfections. It may be difficult at times, overlooking such faults, but patience and kindness reign and love is continually extended. Trust is the default position.

I really tried to write those two paragraphs as objectively as I could, but I guess it's obvious which I prefer, and which I hope I can extend.

I have been thinking a lot about this.

When I grew up, I felt from my father and mother and siblings the second type. I still feel it from them - that they love me unconditionally, unwavering, and in spite of my faults. It is an amazing feeling to feel so accepted, so loved and appreciated and respected. I want to do well so that I can continue in this respect and love, improving myself so that I can be worthy of this love. It is a very positive way of encouraging improvement.

Others I know have grown up in a very different environment. Their love was given/received only as it was earned. Excellence was expected and generally achieved, but because it was expected (nay, demanded!) the only attention or appreciation that was garnered was when something was done poorly. They learned that it is performance that earns others' respect and love. They also learned that negative actions have a deleterious and detrimental effect on their family and friends, and out of fear of loss of respect and even punishment.

I don't disparage others' viewpoint. I guess whatever works for others is what works.

But I wonder how those in what I will call the conditional type ever feel loved. I wonder how others feel loved by them. I wonder a lot of things, I guess.

I had a companion on my mission who was of the conditional type. We were having a companion study one morning when we were prompted by the Missionary Guide (the book we used before Preach My Gospel came out) to talk about an experience with a companion, friend, or family member whom we had loved/learned from in spite of their mistakes. I spoke about an elder who was my companion several months previous and who had trouble keeping the commandments, much less the mission rules. Yet, I loved him. We had great success together, teaching and baptizing. We did not see eye to eye on much, but we really cared for each other and I felt like the Lord blessed us because of that...

My (at the time) current companion had had this elder as a companion before as well. He said - I never loved him. He wasn't worthy of my love. He didn't keep the rules exactly, so how could I love him? You don't keep all the rules either, so I don't love you either. You're not worthy of my love.

I was shocked. I could have guessed that he didn't really care for me - that's fine. You're not required to love your companion (the very thought is ludicrous!) but to actually hear something like that was quite surprising. I didn't know ANYONE on the mission who kept the rules 100% of the time. I tried my best to keep the rules, and I feel like I was a good missionary. But no one is perfect.

So how can one love another if they are unworthy because of imperfection? How can they love themselves? Seems a very frustrating and lonely way to live...

And what right does one have to tell another that they will only love if genuine effort is being made to overcome imperfections?

I honestly don't know.

Comments

foxiecheese202 said…
Profound. I like the way you think, most of the time. But should I condemn you because of slight disagreements, no. God wants us to be good, but he loves us regardless. And we receive blessings even when we aren't being perfect, so by his example we can see what the greater love is. Besides, we are never perfect so we have no right to judge others because they are not. Thanks for not being scared to express your point of view on all things. Your writing makes you have an interesting blog.

Popular posts from this blog

Is this thing still on?

 Does anyone even blog anymore? I remember when it first got started and everyone was having a blog. I like writing, and I do a lot of it in my professional life, but not everything makes it onto this blog, which is where a lot of my personal thoughts come out. I put more into Facebook lately, too, because it's a little easier. But there's something to be said for this long-form writing exercise, and I think I will continue here periodically. You don't mind, do you? Well, in my last post I wrote about how difficult things were for me at the time. That changed in July when I finally got a job working for the State of Utah. I was the program manager for the moderate income housing database program, and that meant I worked from home a lot but also went in to Salt Lake when needed, mostly on the train. It was a good experience, for the most part, and I'm grateful for the things I learned even in the short time I was there.  In October I started working for Weber County in t...

The Other Art

I'm not sure we appreciate photography as much as we do other art forms. Part of this comes from the reality that surrounds and permeates a photograph - it's very, very real, and the photographer strives for clarity and crispness in the representations. Perhaps this is why black and white images continue to be relevant - they strip away extraneous information (color) and leave us with something that is at once familiar and also non-existent - for nothing exists in black and white. Nothing. I also think that pictures are becoming too common-place... Everyone has a camera in their pocket, and while that's a very democratic thing (everyone can express themselves in a picture easily and readily, and can find an audience for these images, which are casually taken and casually viewed, and perhaps just as casually forgotten) I think that we embrace that casual attitude, and it spills over to all aspects of the media, making it impotent. So I read this article this morning: h...

A Romantic Encounter

Him (tears in his eyes, heartbroken): I want you to know that I love you, that I'm sorry for my weakness and frailties, and that I will try and do better. I think I am doing better than I was before, and I just want to please you and make you happy. I am very grateful for your continued patience as I try to be the kind of man I want to be. Her: You need a haircut. It's getting a little long.