I appreciate people who think.
I appreciate more people who can think for themselves.
I respect people who can dream.
I revere people who can take those dreams and put them into action - making the world a better place.
I am not sure why, but I keep getting little ads on the right side of my screen from people who want me to download something from Ayn Rand. I find it amusing because I am morally repulsed by Ayn Rand and everything she stands for. I find her views repugnant in the extreme. And yet, there the ads are, like a constant thorn in my side.
The kind of extreme capitalism that Ayn Rand and her followers promote results in the very worst kind of humanity imaginable. This kind of narcissistic objectivism allows for only the promotion of one's own self interest and views others not as people but as tools. This is the same kind of thinking that led Hitler and his regime to come to view Jews as expendable. Rationally, people who are unproductive and unuseful are a drain on the resources of a society. So burn them all - like so much cord wood. Don't believe me? Read Heidegger. But remember, we can judge Heidegger from the historical perspective, in our enlightened and post-modern world. He never repudiated his ideas, though many current philosophers have. He was a product of the time - as was Ayn Rand.
They were reacting to the excesses seen in Leninism, Maoism, and in particular Stalinism. We can also react to the same excesses using the same historical view - that people have intrinsic worth. That people are valuable because they are people. And that we must value the contributions of each individual, no matter how meager, because of what the alternative speaks about us.
The extreme capitalism that Rand puts forth would have us forget these truths - that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Happiness is not attained in the frivolous expungement of worldly and carnal desires and appetites. Rather, true happiness is found in leading a life that is morally true and spiritually sound. We grow together only as strong as the weakest among us.
Capitalism and a free market, in the vein that Rand would like to see, perpetuates the exploitation of the people - treats them as a resource to be expended. Anything that one can do to increase the bottom line is fair. People who have worked for a company for years are only as valuable as their contributions to that bottom line - irregardless of what they contribute intangibly to the company, such as a continuation of the company spirit and the wisdom that only comes through experience. Corporations only have their share holders to account to - they have neither soul nor body. Yet we have afforded these corporations many of the same rights that used to belong to people, and the creed has become life (of the corporation), liberty (of the market), and the pursuit of capital. Benevolent plutocrats are supposed to take care of us. But they don't. Why should they? They're living the dream!
And in the process, entire cultures, languages, and peoples, not to mention the environment, are being expended at an alarming rate. All under the cry of "freedom" and "modernization". People are told live free (open your market) or (you will) die. The sad thing is, what this becomes is "live like me or you will die." The arrogance of this kind of thinking is staggering. Where is the choice? Where is the autocracy? What about democracy? Are their lives better? Really? Why?
I appreciate more people who can think for themselves.
I respect people who can dream.
I revere people who can take those dreams and put them into action - making the world a better place.
I am not sure why, but I keep getting little ads on the right side of my screen from people who want me to download something from Ayn Rand. I find it amusing because I am morally repulsed by Ayn Rand and everything she stands for. I find her views repugnant in the extreme. And yet, there the ads are, like a constant thorn in my side.
The kind of extreme capitalism that Ayn Rand and her followers promote results in the very worst kind of humanity imaginable. This kind of narcissistic objectivism allows for only the promotion of one's own self interest and views others not as people but as tools. This is the same kind of thinking that led Hitler and his regime to come to view Jews as expendable. Rationally, people who are unproductive and unuseful are a drain on the resources of a society. So burn them all - like so much cord wood. Don't believe me? Read Heidegger. But remember, we can judge Heidegger from the historical perspective, in our enlightened and post-modern world. He never repudiated his ideas, though many current philosophers have. He was a product of the time - as was Ayn Rand.
They were reacting to the excesses seen in Leninism, Maoism, and in particular Stalinism. We can also react to the same excesses using the same historical view - that people have intrinsic worth. That people are valuable because they are people. And that we must value the contributions of each individual, no matter how meager, because of what the alternative speaks about us.
The extreme capitalism that Rand puts forth would have us forget these truths - that we are endowed by our Creator with certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Happiness is not attained in the frivolous expungement of worldly and carnal desires and appetites. Rather, true happiness is found in leading a life that is morally true and spiritually sound. We grow together only as strong as the weakest among us.
Capitalism and a free market, in the vein that Rand would like to see, perpetuates the exploitation of the people - treats them as a resource to be expended. Anything that one can do to increase the bottom line is fair. People who have worked for a company for years are only as valuable as their contributions to that bottom line - irregardless of what they contribute intangibly to the company, such as a continuation of the company spirit and the wisdom that only comes through experience. Corporations only have their share holders to account to - they have neither soul nor body. Yet we have afforded these corporations many of the same rights that used to belong to people, and the creed has become life (of the corporation), liberty (of the market), and the pursuit of capital. Benevolent plutocrats are supposed to take care of us. But they don't. Why should they? They're living the dream!
And in the process, entire cultures, languages, and peoples, not to mention the environment, are being expended at an alarming rate. All under the cry of "freedom" and "modernization". People are told live free (open your market) or (you will) die. The sad thing is, what this becomes is "live like me or you will die." The arrogance of this kind of thinking is staggering. Where is the choice? Where is the autocracy? What about democracy? Are their lives better? Really? Why?
Comments
No, you are right. Kant, Heidegger, and those who are associated with them seem to be able to objectify anything. But the only difference between them and Rand is the scale - Rand speaks of individuals, Heidegger seems to be speaking of society. My contention is that they are the same philosophy - a belief in capitalism and one's self to the exclusion of all else (including altruism, religion, and similar illogical things). As I wrote, the logical conclusion of such thinking is that people become a resource - an expendable source of labor for production, like so much cord wood, to be used up and tossed aside.
I submit that this is inhuman and inhumane. It speaks to a world held in thrall to capitalism and the greed associated with it.
While Rand may not have been the cause of that many deaths, how many billions are currently languishing in the dark night of ignorance, poverty, and oppression because of the "free market" society that Rand and our current plutocracy have imposed on the world? How many cultures, languages, and peoples are being consumed by the lust for money? Is it better to live or die under such circumstances?
So I may be misguided. But at least I am not being guided by something whose effects are so repulsive. I choose to dream of a world that is motivated by love rather than greed.